Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 13:53

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Why was Nietzsche against essentialism?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Apple's Terminal App Gets Colorful Redesign in macOS Tahoe - MacRumors
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry take kids to Disneyland and the family photos are magical - HOLA
Just in the last 5 years:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Switch 2 Tears Of The Kingdom Confirms Link Respects Women - Kotaku
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Voluptates qui qui deleniti laborum et sed corrupti.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.